Tuesday, March 03, 2015

From the annals of the Most Transparent Administration ever!

On the day that former CIA Director Petraeus pled to a misdemeanor for breaking security on classified information, we learn that Hillary Clinton used unsecure emails for all of her official communications as Secretary of State

And it seems to be sparking a rift on the left reminiscent of the time prior to Hitler's attack on the Soviet Union, when the Communists were attacking the liberals for being too hard on the Nazis.

Ah, yes, the eternal Bolshevik versus Menshivik split.

Always fun to watch.


Now she's worried about insulting the intelligence of Americans????

Where was that concern when she was telling Americans that she had to pass Obamacare to find out what was in it??????

Nancy Pelosi saddened by "“T saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States." 

Sunday, March 01, 2015

When someone says being "Pro-Choice" doesn't mean being Pro-Abortion...

...show them these pictures.

10 Pictures of Pro-Choice People That Will Blow Your Mind…


if you are an honest, law-abiding person...

....video-record everything!

Man serves abuse complaint on cop, then is arrested based on conspired testimony of fellow cops and attorneys.

//But here’s my question: Why aren’t the seven witnesses to Dendinger’s nonexistent assault on Cassard already facing felony charges? Why are all but one of the cops who filed false reports still wearing badges and collecting paychecks? Why aren’t the attorneys who filed false reports facing disbarment? Dendinger’s prosecutors both filed false reports, then prosecuted Dendinger based on the reports they knew were false. They should be looking for new careers — after they get out of jail.

If a group of regular citizens had pulled this on someone, they’d all likely be facing criminal conspiracy charges on top of the perjury and other charges. So why aren’t these cops and prosecutors?

I could be wrong, but my guess is that they’ll all be let off due to “professional courtesy” or some sort of exercise of prosecutorial discretion. And so the people who ought to be held to a higher standard than the rest of us will once again be held to a lower one.//


Saturday, February 28, 2015

Science P*rn

Could ancient people see the color "blue"?
This is interesting....

...and a first rate bit of historical detective work.

There is far too much pseudo-history in the world.

Atheists defame Catholic priest who led the way into rationality.

Friday, February 27, 2015

Don't know...but the big issue is the Bill O'Reilly is a windbag!

//SO WHY DID HILLARY, AND SUSAN RICE, AND EVERYBODY ELSE, KEEP LYING ABOUT A VIDEO AND GET THE FILMMAKER THROWN IN JAIL? Hillary Clinton’s Top Aides Knew from First Minutes that Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack, E-mails Disclose.//



From the very first moments of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides were advised that the compound was under a terrorist attack. In fact, less than two hours into the attack, they were told that the al-Qaeda affiliate in Libya, Ansar al-Sharia, had claimed responsibility. These revelations and others are disclosed by a trove of e-mails and other documents pried from the State Department by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The FOIA litigation focuses on Mrs. Clinton’s involvement in the government actions before, during, and after the Benghazi attack, in which Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, was murdered by terrorists. Also killed in the attack were State Department information management officer Sean Smith, and two former Navy SEALs, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, who were contract security employees and who had fought heroically, saving numerous American lives. At least ten other Americans were wounded, some quite seriously. At 4:07 p.m., just minutes after the terrorist attack began, Cheryl Mills, Secretary Clinton’s chief-of-staff, and Joseph McManus, Mrs. Clinton’s executive assistant, received an e-mail from the State Department’s operations center (forwarded to her by Maria Sand, a special assistant to Secretary Clinton). It contained a report from the State Department’s regional security officer (RSO), entitled “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi is Under Attack.” The e-mail explained that approximately 20 armed people had fired shots at the diplomatic mission, that explosions had been heard as well, and that Ambassador Stevens was believed to be in the compound with at least four other State Department officials.


If only Clovis teachers could marry...

...double-header in Clovis.


Thursday, February 26, 2015

MSNBC anchor incites racial violence...

...but let's keep the focus on Bill O'Reilly who may have been imprecise on his resume.

Melissa Harris-Perry hopes that Trayvon "whooped on" Zimmerman.

*Sheesh*


Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Remember that crazy, crazy theory about "gay recruitment"?

Yeah, that was totally nuts.

'I'm gay. And I want my kid to be gay too': Lesbian CNN pundit admits she does not want her daughter, 6, to be straight and is 'disappointed' that she is already 'boy crazy'




We've reached a point where life and parody have finally merged.

So, being against murder is "disgusting," while surgically maiming your genitals to pass as a faux-woman is "hunky-dory."

// An anti-abortion and euthanasia society ratified last week has been branded “disgusting” by students.

Life Matters, a group dedicated to awareness and understanding of pro-life issues including abortion, euthanasia and embryonic cell research, formed on Friday after being approved by YUSU’s Societies Committee.

But despite similar groups existing at other universities, its ratification at York has sparked a backlash from students and pro-choice campaigners.

Jack Chadwick, the queer convenor for the LGBTQ Network, said: “I think it’s disgusting.//





Tuesday, February 24, 2015

The Clintons were small time grafters who hit the big time.

Clintons turned the State Department into a racket to line their own pocket.


Because Commies always get a pass.

Next question.

Why is the international environmental movement silent about China's Nicaraguan canal?


Excuse me... I just threw up in my mouth again.

Did you know that wife-swapping, adultery and orgy-participation require an even higher commitment to ethical behavior than normal relationships?

Noted scholar and denier of the existence of Jesus, Richard Carrier, thinks so!

And he has a Ph.D, so he must be smarter than you!

For further insights read this article - Dr. Richard Carrier, Ph.D - a creepy, dishonest hypocrite.

Modern culture - it is a freak show in an insane asylum.

After reading that trash, read this Communio article on the "indissolubility of marriage" and why it matters.

// Rather, many of the challenges facing marriage today are bound up with a much larger shift in man’s understanding of himself as a person, and this new anthropology goes hand in hand with our Western culture’s evolving understanding of marriage and family. “Marriage,” writes Wendell Berry, “has now taken the form of divorce: a prolonged and impassioned negotiation as to how things shall be divided. During their understandably temporary association, the ‘married’ couple will typically consume a large quantity of merchandise and a large portion of each other.”5 Though seemingly paradoxical, Berry’s description reveals accurately that marriage is perceived today as a type of contractual relation established by two human freedoms. Rather than giving all of one’s life, as love requires, in this contract spouses give only a portion of themselves. This partial giving entails that, in their life together, each spouse cannot but try to avoid losing what he is afraid of giving away to the other, that is, himself. Yet, because he does not give all of himself, he must work to keep himself; that is, he must seek to preserve or increase what he considers indispensable for his own happiness: property, pleasure, and, ultimately, power. If living thus becomes a matter of possessing instead of receiving and giving, then, as Berry indicates, spousal love does not establish any real unity. The negotiated “form” of marriage never constitutes a real whole, that is, a communion of life and love. Understood simply as a contract, marriage becomes the mutually agreed-upon juxtaposition of two existences that lasts as long as negotiations endure. Lacking an objective form greater than the spouses’ singular existences, married life is not only deprived of the grounds that enable it to weather the disintegrating forces that erode any nuptial communion; it also actively—albeit most of the time unwittingly—contributesto its own fragmentation.//


 
Who links to me?