Leftists are Jerks...

...a continuing series.

Predictable.

Trump supporters have been assaulted by Sanders/Clinton supporters since the summer of 2016.  Cities have ostentatiously pulled police protection from Trump rallies.

Now, Trump supporters are fighting back.

And predictably they are the ones being held responsible.

You want more 1930-late stage Weimar street thug political action?

This is how you get it.

Scenes from Weimar.

The Progressives are the ones wearing masks to conceal their identity.

The most Fascist Behavior of 2016 Award...

... should go to city's that did nothing to restrain progressives from physically attacking Trump supporters.

Now, a federal judge has permitted Trump supporters to sue San Jose for failing to protect them against violence from Clinton/Sander supporters.

As I pointed out in my review of Timothy Snyder's "On Tyranny, where the Yale professor has thought long and hard and come to the novel conclusion that Trump is Literally Hitler, it is hard not to remember Hillary/Sander supporters attacking Trump supporters and not see the Brown Shirts circa 1932.

Why does the Left have hoaxes and the Right has videos?

Does Philip Wegman get to be a "martyr for life" like John Lewis?

///Families from flyover country were greeted to the nation's capital with chants of "No Trump, no KKK, no fascist USA." When short of breath, protestors opted for the more succinct, "Fuck Trump!" One activist even decided to lecture a young Republican, screaming "don't grow up and grab women by the pussies!" before his father covered his ears.

When words failed them though, protestors turned to rioting. Wearing black face masks, they smashed the windows of Starbucks, Bank of America, and a Bobby Van's steakhouse a few blocks from Capitol Hill. Private business didn't suffer all the damage, though. Suddenly enemies of public transport, liberal rioters trashed at least one bus stop—an indicator of the aimlessness of the whole thing.

These protests can best be described as the opposite of the Tea Party movement. For all their supposed racism and bigotry, those conservative protestors never rioted. They just wore tacky costumes and gave hackneyed interpretations of history.

But the Trump protestors shouldn't get too much credit for Friday's tantrum. So far, they seem like the JV team to the rioters that trashed Ferguson and Baltimore. Most didn't know whether to take selfie or retreat in front of a police line. A pile of flaming trashcans served as more of a prop for Instagram than a barricade for police.

Of course, they weren't all bad though. Some showed real kindness. When one rioter threw my phone on the pavement and another threw me to the ground, a volunteer medic team rushed over to check me for a concussion. They were kind and sweet but it was evident they'd just missed an opportunity.//

Stay Classy, Leftists.

This didn't happen during the Obama inauguration, but now that it is not depicted as outrageous by the media maybe it will happen the next time a Democrat wins?

https://www.facebook.com/wjlatv/videos/10154979199008734/

More Hillary supporters show what it means to accept the outcome of an election.

Does anyone think that Republicans would be doing this if the outcome had been different?

Organizing to trespass and destroy property sounds like a criminal conspiracy.

//On the day of President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration protesters are planning an anti-capitalist march, road blockades and disruptions to inauguration balls. The protests will likely include property destruction, a source with intimate knowledge of the protest plans told The Daily Caller Friday.

The blockades are not limited to roads but will also be at every security checkpoint, the source said. The source added that the protesters blockading each checkpoint will represent a different liberal cause such as climate change or money in politics.

A group called #DisruptJ20 is the most active in the planned protests for the inauguration.

Organizers for #DisruptJ20 are planning to kick off the inauguration protests on Jan. 18 with a gay dance party outside of Vice President-elect Mike Pence’s Chevy Chase, MD home.//

Why is it that the Left has hoaxes, while conservatives have videos and hard evidence of leftist violence....

...and now death threats against disabled artists?

Why is the left such a cesspool of hatred against the disabled and artists?

//Opera star Andrea Bocelli backs out of singing at Trump's inauguration after receiving death threats

Blind tenor Bocelli announced he would not sing at this Friday's celebration

Widely reported it was because fan said they would boycott his concerts

Revelation came as another singer, Jennifer Holliday, last night pulled out //

It is nice to see push-back on the pop front.

'I didn't hear Meryl Streep give a shout out to the mentally challenged boy tortured on Facebook': Kellyanne Conway piles in on Trump's attack on Clinton-backing Golden Globe winner

Meryl was concerned about a fake story concerning a disabled man, but ignored the attack on a disabled man by people shouting anti-Trump slogans.

Why is it that the left has hoaxes and the right has videotaped evidence?

They said that if Trump was elected Muslims would be vilified and abused.

And they were right.

Muslim who voted for Trump harassed by tolerant Leftist professor.

Perhaps, the professor thought that the student would grow up and become a plumber?

Interesting that the side that is fearful is the side that is concocting fake hate crimes.

Why Trump was elected, Part Umpteenth.

Because average Americans are tired of the hypocrisy and hectoring.

And check out the last sentence.

Great summary of the situation.

//Why can’t the alt-left call a hate crime a hate crime?

Is it because some hate crimes are more hateful than others? Or less?

Finally, yesterday, the Chicago police charged the four aspiring rappers with a hate crime for allegedly beating, torturing and kidnapping a white mentally disabled kid from the suburbs.

They were screaming “Bleep white people!” and “Bleep Trump!” but none of the PC posse wanted to … uh, jump to any conclusions.

Take Obama — please. His flack Josh Earnest was asked if this was a hate crime.

“I think it’s too early to tell.”

No call from Obama for a “national conversation” about hate crimes. He didn’t even call it “workplace violence.”

Then there was Don Lemon, last seen drunk on New Year’s Eve on CNN. Apparently, he’s still on his bender, because this is what he said:

“I don’t think it’s evil. I think these are young people and I think they have bad home training.”

Bad home training. Hey, I’ll bet these at-risk youths were turning their lives around too. That’s why one of Lemon’s guests, one Symone Sanders, said that we shouldn’t be “callously classifying” a kidnapping accompanied by a few chants of “Bleep white people!” as a hate crime.

Yeah, they’re lovely people — Tanashia and Brittany Covington, Tesfaye Cooper and Jordan Hall. Tanashia is 24 and the others are 18. Which, according to Chicago PD Commander Kevin Duffin, makes them “kids.”

“Kids make stupid decisions … That will certainly be part of whether or not we determine this is a hate crime or whether or not this is stupid ranting and raving.”

Here was the Boston Globe headline on the hate crime: “4 questioned after video of apparent racial attack in Chicago.”

Apparent. On MSNBC it was called an “apparent beating.” Apparently, whoever wrote these headlines didn’t see the video.

Various local newscasts said the thugs had “detained” the white kid, who was “picked on” and/or “bullied.”

What if this had happened to some Muslim terrorist at Gitmo? The same pajama boys now averting their eyes from the truth would be hollering for war crimes trials.

This wasn’t the first post-election black-on-white hate crime on the West Side. In November, a 50-year-old white man was dragged from his car by four people screaming obscenities about Trump. That hate crime was likewise recorded on videotape.

Police arrested Rajune Lewis, Dejuan Collins, Julian Christian and a juvenile and … do you remember seeing anything about this on the network newscasts? Me neither.

Compare this kid-glove treatment for all these thugs to what happened to the two Babson College students who drove over to Wellesley College after the election. Let’s let Babson President (and former Lt. Gov.) Muffy Healey describe how her students “engaged in behavior that was, at a minimum, insensitive, unacceptable and contrary to our core values.”

Their crime? They were yelling “Trump 2016!” and “Make America Great Again.”

Muffy banned them from campus and they were kicked out of their frat. They had to hire lawyers to fight Muffy’s fake news.

If it wasn’t for double standards, the alt-left wouldn’t have any standards at all.//

Why is it that the Left is in hysterics about its own hoaxes, whereas the Right has actual videos of the violence against it and seems to be coping?

Maybe because one is treated like special snowflakes and the other isn't?

ABC, NBC Skip White Chicago Man Being Tortured Live on Facebook by Four African-Americans

//On the Wednesday network evening newscasts, ABC’s World News Tonight and NBC Nightly News failed to inform their viewers of an incredibly disturbing alleged beating in Chicago of a developmentally challenged white man by four African-American suspects that was streamed live on Facebook.

The torturing session saw the man (who previously had been reported missing) being bound with tape and bloodied from cuts to his scalp as the suspects laughed at him and shouted “fuck Trump” and “fuck white people.”


With ABC and NBC choosing to keep their audiences in the dark on this (at least until Thursday morning), the CBS Evening News was the lone network left to cover it. However, fill-in anchor Josh Elliott could only muster a 27-second news brief that only vaguely described the situation.

“Well, Chicago, which just had one of its most violent years ever, was the scene of another horrifying attack this week. A young man, described as law enforcement sources as developmentally challenged, was beaten, kicked, and tormented for half an hour,” Elliott explained.

He concluded by alluding to the assault being broadcasted on Facebook and how the victim “had been reported missing from his home in the suburbs” but “is now in the hospital and four suspects are in custody.”

Here’s a more detailed summary of what we know so far from Chicago’s Fox 32:

Chicago investigators are questioning four African-Americans after a Facebook Live video shows a group of people torturing a white mentally disabled man while someone yelled "F*** Trump!" and "F*** white people!"

Chicago police were made aware of the video Tuesday afternoon. A young African American woman streamed the video live on Facebook showing at least four people holding the young white man hostage.

On Tuesday afternoon, police officers spotted the victim walking on a street on the West Side wearing shorts, Guglielmi said. Because it was unusual to see a man in shorts in the cold weather, the officers stopped to talk to the man, who appeared disoriented, and he was taken to a hospital to be treated for his injuries.

At a press conference late Wednesday night, Chicago police superintendent Eddie Johnson told reporters that the video “put on display the brazenness of the offenders, who assaulted the victim and then broadcast it for the entire world to see.”

Johnson warned that “[i]f you commit an act of violence in the city of Chicago, you will feel the full weight of the Chicago Police Department.”//

There's "fake news" and then there's news that Americans aren't permitted to hear by the news media that decides what's news.

Given the documented violence and the incitement of hatred against Trump supporters, does anyone really doubt that these things happened?

//At least 2,000 educators around the country reported racist slurs and other derogatory language leveled against white students in the first days after Donald Trump was elected president. But the group that surveyed the teachers didn’t publish the results in its report on Trump-related “hate crimes.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center partnered with the American Federation of Teachers, which formally endorsed Hillary Clinton, to circulate the questionnaire among its 1.6 million mostly Democratic members. The survey was sent out to K-12 teachers and administrators who subscribe to its “Teaching Tolerance” newsletter.

The SPLC’s widely cited report — “The Trump Effect: The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election on Our Nation’s Schools” — reported that 40 percent of the more than 10,000 educators who responded to the survey “have heard derogatory language directed at students of color, Muslims, immigrants and people based on gender or sexual orientation.”

The takeaway was that Trump-supporting white kids have been harassing minorities at the nation’s schools. And SPLC’s schools report, along with a broader report on alleged Trump-inspired hate crimes — “Ten Days After: Harassment and Intimidation in the Aftermath of the Election” — sparked breathless coverage in the New York Times, Washington Post and other major media.

The reports also triggered a statement Friday from the US Commission on Civil Rights, which expressed “deep concern” that “prejudice has reared its ugly head in public elementary and secondary schools.” The panel called for more federal funding to prosecute “hate crimes.”

But the SPLC didn’t present the whole story. The Montgomery, Ala.-based nonprofit self-censored results from a key question it asked educators — whether they agree or disagree with the following statement: “I have heard derogatory language or slurs about white students.”

Asked last week to provide the data, SPLC initially said it was having a hard time getting the information “from the researchers.” Pressed, SPLC spokeswoman Kirsten Bokenkamp finally revealed that “about 20 percent answered affirmatively to that question.”

Bokenkamp did not provide an explanation for the absence of such a substantial metric — at least 2,000 bias-related incidents against white students — from the report, which focuses instead on “anti-immigrant sentiment,” “anti-Muslim sentiment” and “slurs about students of color” related to the election.

“They left that result out because it would not fit their ideological narrative,” former Education Department civil rights attorney Hans Bader said. “It was deemed an inconvenient truth.”

Part of the special moment that is 2016, is being lectured about how violent Trump supporters are...

...when all the actual violence has been committed by the left, usually on Trump supporters.

An objective observer might conclude that the Klan are kind of pussies compared to the Red Guard and other Communist supporters of Hillary Clinton.

For all the weeping and wailing about the Klan - which might as well be a chapter of the Moose Lodge for all the violence they get involved in these days - we never hear anything about the Communists, who are active Hillary supporters and are actually burning things and hurting people.

//The Texas Department of Public Safety says it arrested 6 members of a local communist group, Red Guards Austin, for assaulting pro-Trump members in Sunday's protest.//

The invisibility of Communists - who actually do exist and are linked with a repugnant tyranny that killed more people than any other ideology in history - is remarkable, which is to say that it fits the "narrative."

Meet your "spontaneous" protesters for "justice."

They supported mass murder, oppression and state terror for a century, and they are hoping for a second century.

//Along with the anarchists, core organizers of the protests have included the ANSWER Coalition, a group with roots that trace back to supporting the Soviet invasion of Hungary in the 1950s, and the Socialist Alternative, a Trotskyist group on the other side of those forgotten Communist civil wars. Those groups’ organizing muscle has long made them important, if controversial, elements of the US left (they were central to protests against the Iraq War in 2003), and they now find themselves marching with Bernie Sanders supporters, civil rights advocates, and thousands of Democrats shocked at Trump’s election.//

My theory is that the values of the Trotskyite and Communist Left have become mainstream in the modern left, which explains why so much mainstream politics looks like the quest for purity and shunning of the impure that I read in history books about the internal conduct of the CPUSA circa 1930.

Liberal Intolerance.

The fact that conservatives are more tolerant gets proven in study after study, like this recent Pew Study.

//A large Pew survey shows that Donald Trump’s supporters are more tolerant, open-minded, respectful and understanding than are Hillary Clinton’s vibrantly diverse supporters in her coalition of ethnic, sexual, professional and progressive factions.
“Clinton backers – particularly highly educated ones – have more difficulty respecting Trump supporters than the other way around,” Pew acknowledged in the Nov. 1 report.

That data is a mirror image of the media-magnified portrayal of Trump’s supporters that Democratic partisans have constructed throughout the 2016 campaign.

That image has been fostered by undercover Democratic groups which used extensive funding to arrange camera-ready fights at Trump’s rallies, by Clinton’s scripted eagerness to portray Trump’s supporters as irredeemable or insanely hostile to gays, migrant foreigners and Islamic believers, and by the media’s eagerness to showcase conflict at Trump rallies.

But Pew’s data shows that:

nearly six-in-ten registered voters who back Clinton (58%) say they have a “hard time” respecting someone who supports Trump for president; 40% say they have “no trouble” with it. Nearly the opposite is true among Trump supporters, with 56% saying they have no trouble respecting someone who backs Clinton and 40% saying they do have trouble with it.

That’s a 17-point tolerance difference between the two parties.//

I repeat my observation: conservatives are used to dealing with liberals. They are habituated to dealing with the Other at school, in movies, in concerts, now in sports, and in society generally.

Liberals can live in a cocoon where they never have to interact with anyone who disagrees with them. They are never exposed to different ideas.

Thus, liberals are able to pride themselves on their "tolerance" while being intolerant in practice.

More liberal fascism.

This is getting so common that it is getting boring and/or a sign that a person has arrived as a perceived threat to the liberal way of lift.

Dilbert author "shadowbanned" from Twitter.

How dare he support Trump and ask for examples of violence against Trump supporters.

"Everyone must conform," explained the liberal.

Leftist Brownshirts for Tolerance and Diversity.

It seems that the media is always discerning fascism in the Trump camp when it keeps erupting in the Clinton movement.


Horror! LEFTIST MOB Beats, Kicks, Pummels TRUMP Supporter for Wearing #MAGA Hat – SAVED by Police –VIDEO

Liberal Fascism.

Why is it that Trump supporters keep getting called fascist"...

...when the Brownshirt goons keep showing up on the other side?

//A group of aggressive protesters were caught on video harassing and assaulting Trump supporters as they left a fundraising event on Friday in Minneapolis.

“Racist!” one protester shouts in the video.

“This is how we treat racists!” another screams.

As the American Mirror’s Kyle Olson described it, the Trump supporters were essentially forced to run a “gauntlet” in order to leave.//

This seems to be a theme of this election cycle.