The next big issue in Civil Rights will be whether "people with uteruses who do not identify as women" can serve on the USS Illinois.

Here is the story about the first all-women USN submarine.

And here is a post where a feminist begins to answer questions with the following disclaimer - and from their descends into utter confusion, narcissism and a philosphical system based on "I want it; give it to me":

Note from Dianna: I want to just put a general note of thanks here. I know Feminism is a really touchy topic, so I’m glad to see such an even-keeled discussion. That said, I do want to acknowledge that man and woman are categories that don’t necessarily correspond to biological sex. When I discuss “women” in, say, the abortion question, I also wish to include people with uteruses who do not identify as women. I’m aware that’s a point that many, many readers will not agree with, but Feminism is nothing if it is not intersectional.

"Intersectional"...right...because there is a suprising intersection beween people with uteruses and, well, people with uteruses.

"People with uteruses who do not identify as women" is going to become one of my favorite phrases, along with "people with uteruses who do identify as women."

Because nothing is more important to society as people feeling okay about their denial of reality.