Liberal Totalitarianism.
Social Science suggests that the politicization of everything destroys the spread of ideas.
//Loosening these tight group boundaries means that people's next-door neighbors may have different jobs or levels of education, but they may still have similar politics or recreational activities. These similarities allow people in different social groups to encourage the adoption of a new complex idea, take neighborhood recycling as an example, which can then spread to other neighborhoods and social groups.
But when group boundaries are eliminated entirely, people have almost nothing in common with their neighbors and therefore very little influence over one another, making it impossible to spread complex ideas.
"There's a belief that the more that people interact with strangers, the more that new ideas and beliefs will spread," Centola said. "What this study shows is that preserving group boundaries is actually necessary for complex ideas to become accepted across diverse populations."//
Interesting that this is the world created by "Liberal Totalitarianism," which seeks by seeking to politicise everything creates a Manichean world of Good v. Evil based on "race" or "tolerance" without the nuance of intermediate groups that aren't permitted to dispense with such ultimate orientation.
Football, for example, used to be something that could be watched by Democrats and Republicans, people of all races, Rotarians, and Elks, but as soon as there became an ideology based on the notion that America was an evil, racist country where there was a conspiracy of police officers hunting down "unarmed black men" football players either had to subscribe to this ideology or leave.
The net result is that football is no longer a social organizing principle where ideas could bleed across. Instead, it became a megaphone used by the Left to drown out any message other than the dominant Leftist message.
And America became poorer and closer to the edge because of it.
Saturday, September 30, 2017
Labels:
Liberal Totalitarianism - 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





















12 comments:
"without the nuance of intermediate groups that aren't permitted to dispense with such ultimate orientation."
But Peter, you dispense with ultimate orientation almost constantly. And I never remember Monday Night Football parties or Superbowl parties including much of new ideas "bleeding" across. Maybe that's how it works in Alabama?
"football players either had to subscribe to this ideology or leave"
Funny, the weekend before the leader of conservatives in the United States shot his mouth off (an excellent example of ideas bleeding across), 9 players out of about 1.650 took a knee. No players left or were forced to leave or were forced to even comment on the issue. But it sure paints a dramatic picture to say so. You see, Colin K. squatting at a Niners game doesn't even make the top 100 list of issues facing the country.
And when did the Rotarians and Elks become adversaries?
"an ideology based on the notion that America was an evil, racist country where there was a conspiracy of police officers hunting down 'unarmed black men' "
It would have been more laconic of you to replace this entire phrase with the word"uppity."
True. I've listened to many rabid football fans who have tuned out on Monday Night Football for me to think otherwise.
The NFL is like a canary in the cultural mine shaft of the nation.
Peter, please let us know your view on gun control given Sunday's events. "Pro-Gun" in ALL its manifestations is currently a cornerstone of Republican and conservative ideology. Do you support the "pro-gun" views supported by most conservatives?
What does the 2A have to do with then NFL?
Anonymous,
Your inability to read continues to impress.
According to the social science article I cited, what de Tocqueville called partial associations are areas that help to accidentally distribute ideas. Although the intent of watching football games is not to distribute ideas, when there is a mix of people ideas can and do get distributed, accidentally.
This is hardly a new idea. Read "Democracy in America" sometime.
Read something, anyhow.
As for your point about the small number of players involved prior to two weeks ago, you don't account for declining audience for the NFL which polling shows was because of the politicization before Trump's comment. Trump, of course, was simply expressing something felt by fans, and which has to do with the the NFL's inaction again against Kaepernick and its action against, for example, Dallas players who wanted to show support for the Dallas police officers killed by a BLM supporter.
People knew that the NFL was being politicized before Trump spoke. Trump gave voice to their feelings. The NFL proved that their perceptions were correct.
And I never said that Elks and Rotarians were enemies, just as I never said that any of the other groups were enemies.
I used them all as examples of "partial associations."
Your basic lack of an ability to read what I've written rather than what your ideological bias wants to read in what I've written is the most reliable feature of your commments.
Toby,
Thank you for proving the point of my post.
I was, of course, quoting a newspaper article on the NFL players that used the phrase "unarmed Black men" as the reason for their actions.
As a kneejerk leftist, you chose to insinuate the toxic claim that I'm a racist.
That would be a perfect example of the point of study and a demonstration about how the left uses false accusations of racism to stifle free speech.
Good work!
John,
The Second Amendment has nothing to do with this post.
This is just Anonymous's usual tactic of pointing to a squirrel to distract from a point he can't address, usually after he's mischaracterized the point.
Typical.
Boring.
Peter never posts about guns, so I was left to ask in this post. Guns (actually, more guns) is a major focus of Republican and conservative politics. I was wondering how Peter feel about guns.
So jn the end, your okay calling black men who believe they are unfairly the victims of violence at the hands of police assholes and sons of bitches, and your okay if the President of the United States uses these terms as well. I disagree with your view.
"Although the intent of watching football games is not to distribute ideas, when there is a mix of people ideas can and do get distributed, accidentally."
You can reference de Tocqueville to sound officious all you want, but based on my experience watching football games does nothing to distribute ideas other than those related to football, and occasionally other sports. And if it was some highly efficient venue to distribute political ideas, then it sounds like a pretty good locale to conduct silent political protests. Regarding racism, the men protesting for the last 9 months or are vastly made up of black men. The snowflakes complaining about it seem to be mostly white. Whether racists or not, the optics of white men calling a bunch of successful black men assholes and sons of bitches for protesting police violence is really bad. Maybe you need a safe space, cause you sound like a nutty progressive college student. who can't handle the ideas of others.
"And I never said that Elks and Rotarians were enemies, just as I never said that any of the other groups were enemies."
Another example of why so many (almost all) successful comedians are liberal. Conservatives have no sense of humor.
Knee-jerk conservative locker room talk:
Never talk about race because I am not a racist.
Never assert race as an element in any situation because it makes you a kneejerk leftist.
Never talk about gun control because your politicizing tragedy.
Never talk about tax cuts because its class warfare.
Never talk about guaranteeing peoples access to adequate healthcare because its socialism.
Never share ideas I disagree with because that's liberal totalitarianism.
Never talk about deficits because a Republican is now in the Presidency.
Never play politics because thats what I do.
Never question blind patriotism because I don't like questions about my blindness.
Never question being drafted and sent to fight and die in Vietnam because America love it or live it.
Don't question police actions and tactics because that supports the murder of police.
Don't question the legitimacy of my president because yours wasn't even an American.
Don't mess with the NFL because, as de Tocqueville surely would have suggested, the NFL is a partial association critical to the sharing of political and social ideas and we only want to have critical political and social ideas shared that we agree with.
Post a Comment