The best way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it impartially...
...and likewise bad customs.
Hypersensitivity about seduction was hunky-dory when it was applied to the lesser breeds - e.g., conservatives and Foxnews employees - but once hypersensitivity began to be applied equally to the Good People, that was too much.
//More than 100 women signed an open letter Tuesday arguing against the #MeToo movement.
The letter, signed by renowned French actress Catherine Deneuve as well as writers, historians, journalists and entertainers, was published in Le Monde to “we defend freedom to importune, indispensable to sexual freedom.”
“Rape is a crime, but trying to seduce someone, even persistently or back-handedly, is not — nor is men being gentlemanly a macho attack,” the letter said.
“Men have been punished summarily, forced out of their jobs when all they did was touch someone’s knee or try to steal a kiss.”//
She's right, but this is the world that her class has made.
Let it burn itself out.
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Labels:
Sex Abuse - By Hollywood
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





















1 comment:
It sounds an awful lot like you think its okay for a man with power over a women (employer, cop, politician, mover-and-player in an industry) to "try to seduce someone (her), even persistently or back-handedly." Did I get your point correctly? How about masterbation in the hallway of a hotel, it that okay as well? How about making a job offer contingent on sex, is that okay? How about "I'll blackball you in an industry if you don't have sex, is that okay?
In my professional life every employer I've ever had would not tolerate me or anyone else who worked for my employers tolerate an employee "trying to seduce someone, even persistently or back-handedly" that was a fellow employee.
What kind of world do you want the young women in your family to grow up and live in. It sounds like a pretty horrible one. Or maybe you just don't like women who push back?
Post a Comment