Boston Marriages.

Massachusetts Supreme Court enacts Gay Marriage law.

Massachusetts divorce bar hails legal ruling.

Person afflicted with "multiple sex partner attraction," "intergenerational sex attraction" and "dead sex attraction" complain that they have thus far been left out of the equal protection promise of the Massachusetts Constitution.

Update: The Boi from Troy isn't thrilled with the ruling, for other reasons. (Ha, Boi, do you like that M.C. Escher approach to blogging?)

On the other hand, Chris Burgwald makes explicit what was implied in my obscure psuedo-headlines. To wit, what is it about "twosies" that the Constitution - Massachusetts, in this case - doesn't recognize in "threesies?"

And, incidentally, why isn't Lane Core absolutely correct in this prediction. I mean, 60% of the population already oppose Gay Marriage; the cause of Gay Marriage has been ebbing since Lawrence; and, if there's one thing that really ticks off a lot of Americans, it's the Imperial Judiciary.