An actual answer to a philosophy problem, by gum!

Yet, it manages to raise the question, "where would we be without handicapped Third World children for creepy scientists and philosophers to use as lab rats?"

The problem is called "Molyneux's Problem" and it goes as follows:

If a blind person were suddenly able to see, would he be able to recognize by sight the shape of an object he previously knew only by touch? Presented with a cube and a globe, could he tell which was which just by looking?


Pause for a moment and think of the answer. Then read on.


The question goes to the heart of a problem in the philosophy of mind: Is there an innate conception of space common to both sight and touch, or do we learn that relationship only through experience? Research published online April 10 in the journal Nature Neuroscience may have finally answered the question, which has vexed philosophers and scientists for more than 300 years.

William Molyneux, an Irish politician and scientist, first raised the issue in a letter to John Locke in 1688. Locke took up what came to be known as Molyneux’s problem in “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,” published a few years later.

Locke’s answer was no. “He would not be able with certainty to say which was the globe, which the cube, whilst he only saw them,” he wrote, “though he could unerringly name them by his touch.” For Locke, the connection between the senses was learned.

The answer:

Working with a group that provides medical treatment to the blind and visually impaired in resource-poor countries, the researchers tested five subjects from rural northern India, four boys and a girl ages 8 to 17. A all had been blind since birth, one with a disorder of the cornea, and the others with cataracts. Before their operations they could perceive light, and two could discern its direction, but none could see objects. Afterward, they all had vision measured at 20/160 or better, good enough to distinguish objects and carry out the tasks of daily living.


The children were tested within 48 hours of their operations. The researchers placed 20 small objects similar to Lego blocks on a table where they could be seen, but not touched. Then they had the children feel identical blocks under the table where they were invisible, and try to match them with those they could see. The average performance in matching one object with another by either touch or sight alone was high, close to 100 percent. Yet when they were asked to match an object they had felt with an object seen, the average number of correct answers dropped to barely better than chance.

But improvement was rapid. A co-author of the study, Yuri Ostrovsky, a postdoctoral fellow at M.I.T., said one child was proficient in less than a week. Within three months, the average number of right answers in matching an object seen with one touched was above 80 percent.

So, Locke was right.