Monday, October 28, 2013

Obamacare Trainwreck.

Maybe this lady will get "subsidies."

Maybe not.

But tell me this: if she gets a "subsidy," doesn't that mean that an insurance company is being paid an extra $550 a month by the American taxpayer for coverage this woman doesn't need and doesn't want?

Why is this a good idea?

That includes 56-year-old Dianne Barrette. Last month, she received a letter from Blue Cross Blue Shield informing her as of January 2014, she would lose her current plan. Barrette pays $54 a month. The new plan she's being offered would run $591 a month -- 10 times more than what she currently pays.

Barrette said, "What I have right now is what I am happy with and I just want to know why I can't keep what I have. Why do I have to be forced into something else?"

According to HealthCare.gov, Barrette is eligible for some subsidies, CBS News' Jan Crawford pointed out on "CBS This Morning." But Barrette told CBS News she has no idea what those subsidies would be because she cannot log on to the website -- an issue U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is sure to be asked about when she testifies on Capitol Hill Wednesday.


No comments:

 
Who links to me?